andy cunningham comments

Results 13 comments of


                                            andy cunningham

A new path for graphql-cli - help us decide on the roadmap!

One thing i liked about graphql-cli's vs graphql-codegen is the ability to generate a full graphql typescript client with query/mutation/subscription functions that mirror all the possible graphql types. for example...

Failed to activate the atom-yeoman package

looks like it's now happening for `loophole` dependency. [Enter steps to reproduce below:] 1. start atom. **Atom Version**: 1.13.1 **Electron Version**: 1.3.13 **System**: Mac OS X 10.11 **Thrown From**: [atom-yeoman](https://github.com/david-driscoll/atom-yeoman)...

can't ever reset a signal once it's been aborted

hey @mysticatea would you be open to accepting this change as a PR? https://github.com/mysticatea/abort-controller/compare/master...asynchronous-dev:master it isn't necessarily part of the standard... but is useful

Dynamic Port Mapping through Support App LB / Application Entities

dunno if this this the right issue to comment on for ALB support, but this would be a really nice to have for WebSockets. just learned that ELBs don't really...

ASP.Net Core 1.0 compatibility

If you're interested in this, I have a working port to a netstandard1.6 library. some temporary hacks until System.Net.Mail is released along with netstandard2.0: * Removed helpers to map `MailMessage`...

ASP.Net Core 1.0 compatibility

FWIW, this should be in dotnetcore 2.0: https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/pull/12416, so you'll be able to remove that extra mime dependency and add back the System.Net.Mail mapping stuff. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017...

httpeventcollector doesn't seem to work when hitting 8081[2,3] (index slaves)

will try

httpeventcollector doesn't seem to work when hitting 8081[2,3] (index slaves)

i ended up having to actually add the input and token to the slave CONF. didn't seem to propagate via deployment-apps

Add support for optimistic concurrency

This looks like it could be the answer to https://github.com/scale-tone/linq2dynamodb/issues/21, and something i was looking for as well... Would you accept PR for this? And if so have you thought...

Add support for optimistic concurrency

hmmm doesn't look like this will be possible with your current [update implementation](https://github.com/scale-tone/linq2dynamodb/blob/master/Sources/Linq2DynamoDb.DataContext/TableDefinitionWrapper.cs#L365). At least not if you wanted to leverage built-in dynamodb SDK's [support for document versioning](http://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/DynamoDBContext.VersionSupport.html). `BatchWrite`s don't...