andruud

Results 13 issues of andruud

## Request for position on an emerging web specification * WebKittens who can provide input: @anttijk ### Information about the spec * Spec Title: CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 6...

topic: css
venue: W3C CSS WG
from: Google

The algorithm for [setting the timeline of an animation](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-2/#setting-the-timeline) confuses me. When setting the timeline from DocumentTimeline to null, we get different results if we have a pending play task,...

web-animations-2

With `@scroll-timeline` it's possible to switch the timeline and pause the animation at the "same" time. E.g. you can toggle a class like: `.switch { animation-timeline: other; animation-play-state: paused; }`....

scroll-animations-1

[#9451](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9451)

### WebKittens @mdubet ### Title of the spec CSS Nesting ### URL to the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting-1/#nest-rule ### URL to the spec's repository _No response_ ### Issue Tracker URL _No response_...

position: oppose
concerns: duplication
concerns: usability

### WebKittens @mdubet @fantasai ### Title of the spec CSS Nesting ### URL to the spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting-1/#nested-declarations-rule ### URL to the spec's repository https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/tree/main/css-nesting-1 ### Issue Tracker URL _No response_...

topic: css
venue: W3C CSS WG

When an `anchor-scope` is specified with a ``, it scopes the name to that subtree when the anchor name is ["matching"](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-anchor-position-1/#anchor-scope). The problem is that this matching can be interpreted...

css-anchor-position-1

In https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10234 we resolved to give `insertRule` the ability to parse and insert declaration blocks (as `CSSNestedDeclarations` rules). As of recent spec edits, insertRule is now set up to parse...

cssom-1
Agenda+

Currently, `@scope` only accepts _rules_ in its body. If you want to apply something to the scoping root itself, you need to use a `:scope` rule: ``` @scope (div) {...

Needs Edits
css-cascade-6

This came up when discussing #10389: It is currently possible to place bare declarations directly in a `@scope` rule if it's a [nested grouping rule](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting-1/#nested-group-rules): ``` div { @scope (#foo)...

Needs Edits
css-cascade-6