Andrew Bird
Andrew Bird
> I think dpmi is defeating a fix. Yes same program compiled for 'dos protected mode' still fails with runtime 200 error even with r200fix. BTW my pascal knowledge is...
ooh, Claude showed me a way. Have to see if it's true now.
Nope, wishful thinking.
> Also of course you can just run cpp before bpc - then you can use Cish macros. Yes, thanks! I'll probably do something similar to this using python and...
> https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/a/12112 Thanks @stuaxo , that's a very good read.
I added a PR for comcom r200fix test, see https://github.com/dosemu2/dosemu2/pull/2402. Essentially the test just loads each executable and checks that it outputs a known string (the name/version of the compiler...
The new r200fix tests can be run as follows ~~~ test/test_dosemu.py PPDOSGITTestCase.test_comcom_r200fix_protected PPDOSGITTestCase.test_comcom_r200fix_real Test PP-DOS-GIT Comcom r200fix Protected Mode ... expected failure Test PP-DOS-GIT Comcom r200fix Real Mode ... ok...
> Lets not drop the tests for now. If we are to keep them, I think we have to figure out why they are so slow. For instance running the...
> Can this all be responsible for a slow pass? I think it's quite believable. As a test I just lifted the 'C' code for test 58 from the libi86...
Rebased. Actually now I'm reading the conversation it seems to have massively gone off topic.