Andreas Öhlund
Andreas Öhlund
Thanks for the suggestion @ArveSystad , like you say this is tricky from a backwards compatibility perspective. Scope is locked at this stage for this upcoming v9 but we'll see...
@Abrissirba can you elaborate a little on why you need the transaction scope option? https://docs.particular.net/persistence/sql/outbox#transaction-type What transport are you using? Seems like the improvement that you might be looking for...
>From what I understand we need to use the connection from ISqlStorageSession to make sure that we are in the same transaction as the outbox? That is correct. That said...
>Am I correct when I believe that Pessimistic Concurreny is unnessecary when LimitMessageProcessingConcurrencyTo is set to 1? That is correct as long as you are not scaled out >It doesn't...
@Abrissirba we had an internal discussion and decided to close https://github.com/Particular/NServiceBus.Persistence.Sql/issues/645#issuecomment-2505660497 which is a similar proposal to this. In short: Not opening the connection breaks the assumption the connection is...
Would using span links rather than child spans solve this?
Should the same be done for retries? (both immediate and delayed)
Just to be consistent I guess since it is a brand new attempt, no strong opinion
I wonder if this is an issue with calling `UseNServiceBus()` before registering the background service like mentioned here https://docs.particular.net/nservicebus/hosting/extensions-hosting#configuration
👍 For a new header to avoid a breaking change