Ashok Menon

> Am I losing my mind or did I review this already? Or something similar? Shared object deletion support probably?

(I actually hadn't meant to stamp this given there's lots of unanswered questions on your part which will come with non-trivial additions to the PR, sorry for the churn!)

Already implemented.

15s to 70s is not the worst thing in the world... re: protocol config versions, you could probably do it either by sharding by protocol config version? Not sure how...

Thanks for your report @Suficio -- this is a known problem, I'm working on a fix, which should land in the next release. Unfortunately, the underlying issue (related to the...

Re: programmatically generating Move code -- unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion to hand. In the case of limits, setting aggressively small limits seems like the best way to...

@tnowacki, there's some strangeness with module orders in the build output of `sui-framework`, and I can't figure out if it's because of a stale dependency on the old `move-compiler` during...

Yep, sadly persistent -- needs further investigation -- the order of modules is very strange, it interleaves `sui::...` and `std::...` modules, which does not really make sense.

For example: ``` // Move bytecode v6 module 2.address { use 0000000000000000000000000000000000000001::ascii; use 0000000000000000000000000000000000000001::string; use 0000000000000000000000000000000000000002::hex; use 0000000000000000000000000000000000000001::bcs; ``` (From my local network)

Draft until I can run the move bump to the latest version.