Amit
@acroy I guess this is ready. No warnings on v 0.5
@acroy I guess this is ready !
There have been discussions of doxygen support for Julia. I guess that could solve the problem to a good extent. But I really dont know how much of it has...
@acroy could we have an issue for all the functions or we could just list them out here, there was a use case so I thought of this but if...
@klickverbot I guess QuDOS.jl has ptrace implemented [here](https://github.com/acroy/QuDOS.jl/blob/master/src/Qudos.jl), so I guess a work around should be possible to include it in QuBase.
I was thinking whether we could have something like this ``` julia type QuDensityMatrix prob::Array{Float64,1} state::QuStateVec QuDensityMatrix(prob::Array{Float64,1}, state::QuStateVec) = new(prob, state) end QuDensityMatrix(qa::QuDensityMatrix) = QuMatrix(#summation_of_states_outerproduct given by coeffs(qa.prob * (qa.state*(qa.StateVec)'))...
@jrevels I have been thinking on [these](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_matrix#Pure_and_mixed_states) lines. Like given the probability and states we have the summation over the product of respective probabilities of the states and the outer...
@jrevels it would be really helpful to have some application of the cases, just to have an idea of the expected behavior of the mentioned constructs.
@jrevels I guess it should be an error, atleast in this case as we have defined `QuVector` to be a combination of coeffs in a particular basis, so we should...
Hello @blakejohnson, yeah we return the evolved states and not the evolution operator itself. I guess we could have a work around to possibly return the evolution operator !