Andrey Meshkov comments

Results 1060 comments of


                                            Andrey Meshkov

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

Sounds as if it should be handled via rules conversion isn't it? * `[data-testid="primaryColumn"]:others()` -> `:not([data-testid="primaryColumn"])`

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

I might be missing something, but `:not(selector)` seems to be exactly the same thing as `selector:others()`. As I recall, `:not` is not fully supported in uBO, maybe that's the reason...

:has(+ selector) regression.

Есть приличный шанс что `:has` мы теперь нативно применяем, его же в браузеры добавили. Попробуйте `document.querySelectorAll` протестировать в браузерной консоли, отличается ли результат?

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

I assumed it does from the issue text: > Ublock Has :others() Operator..Which Keep Only A Selected Element Of A Page And Remove Everything Else..This Is Very Useful For Link...

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

Ah, then it's even easier, `{ remove: true }` is not needed.

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

Ah, now it makes perfect sense to me, thank you!

Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'

Then I guess it can be rewritten this way, right? `[data-testid="primaryColumn"]:others() -> :not(:has([data-testid="primaryColumn"]))` edit: ah, nope, it cannot, won't cover the elements inside `[data-testid="primaryColumn"]`

URL tracking parameter block doesn't work

`$removeparam` rules are converted with some serious limitations at this moment. We hope to improve this in the future, though.

URL tracking parameter block doesn't work

> Wouldn't it be possible to "enable" the rules that work now and then consider limitations in the future? It will be possible to use AdGuard URL Tracking Protection list...

Deprecate ':remove()' pseudo-class

Generally, it won't affect anyone. The rules that use `:remove()` will be automatically converted to the ExtCSS syntax, we just don't want to have this logic in two places (ExtCSS...