ExtendedCss
ExtendedCss copied to clipboard
Implement new pseudo-class ':others()'
@iSmokeMid69 commented on Thu Feb 09 2023
Issue Details
Ublock Has :others() Operator..Which Keep Only A Selected Element Of A Page And Remove Everything Else..This Is Very Useful For Link Shortener Sites
Details -
subject:others()
Experimental.
Description: Target all elements outside than the currently selected set of elements.
Chainable: Yes.
subject: Can be a plain CSS selector, or a procedural cosmetic filter.
Examples:
twitter.com##:matches-path(/^/home/) [data-testid="primaryColumn"]:others()
nature.com##:matches-path(/^/articles//) :is(.c-breadcrumbs,.c-article-main-column):others()
Introduced in uBO 1.41.1b2
For any element feeding into others(), the resultset of the others() operator will include everything else except:
the descendants of a subject element
the ancestors of a subject element
The resultset will contains the siblings of a subject element except when those siblings are either a descendant or ancestor of another subject element.
Though this operator is unlikely to be used in default lists, it opens the door to create specialized filter lists which purpose is some sort of "reader mode", where everything else than a selected set of elements are hidden from view.
Related discussion:
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/slyjzp/
Proposed solution
No response
Alternative solution
No response
Sounds as if it should be handled via rules conversion isn't it?
-
[data-testid="primaryColumn"]:others()
->:not([data-testid="primaryColumn"])
I might be missing something, but :not(selector)
seems to be exactly the same thing as selector:others()
.
As I recall, :not
is not fully supported in uBO, maybe that's the reason why a new modifier was required.
AFAIK uBO doesn't do :remove()
on the elements.
I assumed it does from the issue text:
Ublock Has :others() Operator..Which Keep Only A Selected Element Of A Page And Remove Everything Else..This Is Very Useful For Link Shortener Sites
I'm sure he meant "hide".
Ublock Has :others() Operator..Which Keep Only A Selected Element Of A Page And ~~Remove~~ Hide Everything Else..This Is Very Useful For Link Shortener Sites
Ah, then it's even easier, { remove: true }
is not needed.
https://github.com/AdguardTeam/ExtendedCss/issues/164#issuecomment-1428507758 / https://github.com/AdguardTeam/ExtendedCss/issues/164#issuecomment-1428557183: :not(bla-bla-car)
don't longer hide parents/siblinghood/childs in CSS?
<body> <!-- A simple ":not" should not hide me -->
<p> uneeded text </p> <!-- it should be hidden due bla-bla-car:others() -->
<div> <!-- A simple ":not" should not hide me -->
<bla-bla-car>
don't hide my parent "div" and "grandparent" body!
<p> text </p> <!-- A simple ":not" should not hide me -->
<div> <!-- A simple ":not" should not hide me -->
<button type="button"> click </button> <!-- A simple ":not" should not hide me -->
</div>
</bla-bla-car>
<p> uneeded text </p> <!-- it should be hidden due bla-bla-car:others() -->
</div>
<p> uneeded text </p> <!-- it should be hidden due bla-bla-car:others() -->
</body>
:others()
is written to correctly omit hiding the parents (without listing them).
As for me, rewriting to pure CSS would require ~~scanning the entire DOM tree. So that the body and other parents (with younger "family") of each element are listed after the comma(s) in the :not
~~ CSS4: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/ExtendedCss/issues/164#CSS4
Ah, now it makes perfect sense to me, thank you!
Then I guess it can be rewritten this way, right?
[data-testid="primaryColumn"]:others() -> :not(:has([data-testid="primaryColumn"]))
edit: ah, nope, it cannot, won't cover the elements inside [data-testid="primaryColumn"]
For only showing .TimelineItem
(comments here), this would also work on uBO (just like ##.TimelineItem:others()
), but doesn't on Adguard (hides everything, even itself).
##:not(.TimelineItem *):not(:has(.TimelineItem *))
not yet sir
Any progress update on this ?🙃
@BlazeFTL it hasn't been yet planned to be implemented soon
With CSS4 should run at page:
body :not(.TimelineItem, .TimelineItem *, :has(.TimelineItem)) { display: none !important }
/* First protect element, second child, last one 'root'. */
body :not([data-testid="primaryColumn"], [data-testid="primaryColumn"] *, :has([data-testid="primaryColumn"])) { display: none !important }
Gaps gone, looks works based on ExtCSS library.
It remains to be assessed whether it is worth replacing comma elements to three ":not
" and how much more resource-intensive it is than the JavaScript version.
In native CSS3 this seems to be the closest:
https://caniuse.com/css-not-sel-list (Chromium 88+, Firefox 84+, Safari 9+)
body :not(.TimelineItem, .TimelineItem *, [data-testid="primaryColumn"], [data-testid="primaryColumn"] *) {
visibility: hidden !important;
/* at own risk in huge DOM tree:
padding: 0 !important;
margin: 0 !important;
height: 0 !important */
}
:root [data-testid="primaryColumn"],
:root .TimelineItem { visibility: visible !important }
with little chance of hiding gaps left by invisible elements.
RraaLL idea is not CSS "selector" (that is procedural selector - works in legacy browsers or with outdated uBo 1.45+ to 1.54 in modern browsers) so do not works in Chrome 105-109 and Firefox 115 as raw CSS (latter I can check in Safari 17.2, Firefox Nightly and Chrome Canary).
Hiding on Chrome 1*-87, Firefox 1*-83, Safari 1*-8 may need (legacy browsers - mostly CSS 2.1):
:root { visibility: hidden !important }
:root [data-testid="primaryColumn"],
:root .TimelineItem { visibility: visible !important }
(With harder implementation hide gaps).