Alex Martini

@ahoppen Thanks for taking a look. Reading it again this morning, I see that 'postfix-expression' doesn't include parenthesized-expression, but you can use parentheses in an in-out expression. One option is...

Thanks, @rintaro. TSPL doesn't generally distinguish between parsing, lexing, semantic analysis, etc. — so its formal grammar doesn't specifically try to include content that parses but is semantically invalid. If...

This got incorrectly (and accidentally) closed as part of merging #199 because both PRs resolve the same GitHub issue. EDIT: Or possibly because commit 028a2ec7647466d8a183206d2a268062a71f51d3 links to this PR.

Thanks for starting this discussion! A couple issues that make this change a bit challenging to review: - The commit message should describe what you changed and why, not just...

@deya-eldeen Is this a change you're still interested in making or advocating for? Or can I close this PR as "not to be merged"?

Thanks for the draft! I think this change is small enough to land in the reference on its own. Separately, we can add `for` loops to the the outline in...

If you don't mind, I'm moving this back to Draft until the compiler implementation lands. We wouldn't want to ship documentation for a feature that developers can't use yet.

The [compiler PR](https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/67594) has been merged to 'main' so marking this ready for review. We may need to not actually merge it yet though — the SE proposal says it's...

@simanerush SE-0408 is marked as implemented in Swift 6.0 now — is this PR still ready to review, or is there anything you want to revise?

Cherry picked this PR's changes as 07b58edbdcfc5e928aa3e2cefe931b70b34675d4 — we will coordinate making both sets of changes on one branch.