alromeros

Hey @haslersn, closing the issue since the topic has been addressed (should be fixed by the previous approach). Feel free to reopen if you want to follow up on the...

@MaisenbacherD @iExalt I think we can safely close this issue since its main topic has been addressed. Feel free to reopen if you consider it necessary. Thanks!

> created [openshift/library-go#1486](https://github.com/openshift/library-go/pull/1486) Just lgtmed, hope we can merge it soon.

Closing this since it's been addressed by https://github.com/openshift/library-go/commit/434fa21f5e457d51f436c4b3804c7803db1da42d. Feel free to reopen if necessary.

Hello @MaxNosov, sorry for the delay but we are working on a PR to implement the requested feature https://github.com/kubevirt/containerized-data-importer/pull/2906. We still need to fix some stuff and decide if it's...

Hey @MaxNosov, after discussing with the team, we've decided to not implement this feature since it's hard to justify the benefits against the possible drawbacks. For more information check the...

Hello @maya-r @sanzende, since https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/5981 is merged I think we should close this issue. Are you ok with that? Thanks!

@mrnold @awels was any progress made on this issue? I see the reporter user has been deleted, should we consider closing this issue?

Oh I see, we had this PR but it's closed https://github.com/kubevirt/containerized-data-importer/pull/1773. I guess no follow-up PR was opened.

Hey @mhenriks, do you think this would make sense in the context of populators?