Alexander Wang
Alexander Wang
@pmoura The `tab` shape is too similar to `package` shape in D2. The `component` shape imo is too UML-specific, and supporting UML is not a goal of D2. Can you...
So the only difference between rectangle and the `component` shape is the two mini rectangles on the left? It's my understanding that that's just an arbitrary symbol that UML bestows...
Would this feature suffice? (https://github.com/terrastruct/d2/issues/1081#issuecomment-2417317267) Basically adding a `` to objects, distinct from label.
That's not a d2 diagram. I thought you were looking for a feature in d2 diagrams for your use case.
We should implement a `width: fill` or something for this. Will do
Maybe grids can further be expanded so that if u place 3 rows of things, they can center and produce this
The size looks reasonable! 1. ELK only uses orthogonal lines (no diagonals). If you can get it working with ELK only and ignore dagre (the layout engine you've been using),...
also reasonable to add further constraints as you see fit, e.g. only rectangles
random inspiration https://diagon.arthursonzogni.com/#GraphDAG
Hi, @DrSensor is this still being worked on?