Alin Tomescu
Alin Tomescu
Sweet! I forgot to ask the most obvious question: are these numbers for `x86_64`?
If submitting a bug report, please tell us in detail what the bug is. _"But Bitcoin uses [...]"_ does not qualify as a bug report. Note that we are _not_...
Closing this issue since it seems to have been addressed by implementing the `OriginatingAddress` table in https://github.com/aptos-labs/aptos-core/pull/2972. Re-open otherwise.
I presume this will be backwards compatible?
> > I presume this will be backwards compatible? > > in what sense? In the sense that we are keeping the old structs around. So this is not a...
One more request, since you are adding new gas parameters, you will need to bump up the `LATEST_GAS_FEATURE_VERSION ` in `aptos-move/aptos-gas/src/gas_meter.rs` (e.g., see [this](https://github.com/aptos-labs/aptos-core/pull/4181/files#diff-679364603fecb616e5964c7236dfd3bdee596c72467c8fe1b543c12912441853)). Right, @vgao1996? (Sorry, I keep forgetting...
> > Sweet! I forgot to ask the most obvious question: are these numbers for `x86_64`? > > Yes ^_^ > > ``` > blas@f1:~$ uname -m > x86_64 >...
I'm coordinating with Blas on re-basing and merging. No worries @davidiw.
If you open an issue, please state the issue clearly. 1. For what types of signatures? Ed25519, BLS signatures over BLS12-381 curves? 2. Where do you want to generate/verify signatures?...
Sorry, I do not understand how we can help you. There are plenty of Ed25519 signature libraries, including for nodejs: https://www.npmjs.com/package/ed25519 I will close this issue for now, since this...