Alexander Corradini

@vturecek @sridmad @kavyako any chance you could share an update on the status of this issue? Are there any planned updates to address it? Thanks.

I stumbled on this issue as I was wondering the same: Besides the document referenced by dmark, I noticed the following: ### [IETF OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-12) ```...

Tagging @nikola-jokic who was active in #3420: Would you be able to help with this issue?

We also started to run into this issue. Unfortunately, re-running doesn't work as workaround, as we keep hitting this issue. Is there a recommended way to work around this limitation?...

Hi @nikola-jokic. Sure, happy to. I just upgraded to `0.9.2` and will share results in ~1 day. **Update 2024-05-21**: No issues after running it for 12+ hours. However, then we...

Thanks a lot @mjeffryes for looking into this. Do you have some thoughts on if this will get addressed and by when? It would help us with planning, as currently...

Thanks @eshepelyuk for the fast response. I've not worked with Go yet, so not sure on a timeline I'd be able to contribute, as it would require some ramp-up before...

FWIW my understanding is that the `aud` claim is defined in [RFC 7519, section 4.1.3](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#section-4.1.3). Here an implementation of the `aud` claim validation in [jose](https://github.com/panva/jose), a quite popular library in...