Albert Llousas Ortiz

Hi! I would like to understand better why you want to deprecate IO, in my mind they have different purposes: - suspend: it is simply a function that can be...

I see your point, I have read the old explanation, and I can understand the rationale behind this PR, my concern is about the expressiveness of a fn signature, with...

Well, it is not so clear. Do you understand my concern? It is mainly about how meaningful is the code when you call it from consumer perspective, maybe I have...

Makes sense ! Thanks for all your answers! really helpful!

Hey people! I've been thinking and even though I agree with you, I am still believe that removing `IO` you will remove a useful type that, besides the **internal** similarities...

I am not a FP expert, but as far as I know, `IO`monad is a functional concept, present in typed fn languages like scala ([cats](https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/datatypes/io.html)) or [haskell](https://wiki.haskell.org/Introduction_to_IO), so if I...

Thanks for your answers, I was playing devil's advocate, you have convinced me. I think a page in the docs, as you propose, should work, in case someone picky like...