Nicolas Hillegeer

I had been too optimistic when reading `change has been submitted` above, and had assumed that the CL description had just missed the "closes #1674" annotation.

It's not just `EBP` references either, here's a pure `ESP` example for the same function. Sometimes rizin gets it right, like here. Dissasembly (good): ```asm 0x00401a5b lea ecx, [upperFileName] ;...

Given the above, it seems like both `ESP` and `EBP` based references can be wrong. Should I pull out the latter case into a separate bug? Something tells me the...

Both of these cases reproduce at current HEAD (266fe6b) too. Is there any way I can debug the way Rizin calculates the variable? Why does it believe at 0x401a80 that...

Is it in a state where it can be tried out? I don't know much about rizin development, but found it really easy to build (kudos on that, it's even...

Thanks for the context. That's helpful. > And get rid of the general problem (see below). I think it might be **5-14 days of work** maybe (highly dependent on previous...

Lots of changes in Rizin since I reported this: #4738, the x86 parts of #2080 seem done, #4736 seems early. I thought I'd try again, by compiling rizin from HEAD...

Sounds great, thanks a lot. I'm excited to start (learning how to) RE again when 0.9 comes and will wait patiently until then.

I know the issue itself isn't resolved, but I recently recompiled rizin from head and looked around in a different part of this binary. Then I noticed that something appears...

This really saved my bacon, now that I have a Stadia controller to supplement my PS4/PS5 ones. The Stadia controller even has sufficient buttons so that I can avoid the...