Alan Morris

> Check it now, I have added a new colab link. Very nice work! So this makes the outputs 650x650 (up from 500x500)? What would it take to get something...

Try something like this: output = img_hr.cpu().data[0] o = output.numpy() o[np.where(o < 0)] = 0.0 o[np.where(o > 1)] = 1.0 output = torch.from_numpy(o) output = T.ToPILImage()(output) output.save(args.output)

The landmark positions are stored as particle files, a simple ASCII format. ``` X1 Y1 Z1 X2 Y2 Z2 X3 Y3 Z3 .... ``` The definitions (which are not required...

So it doesn't have a direct import functionality. You can supply the files by adding them to the xlsx spreadsheet or json file: You can double check the structure by...

ShapeWorksStudio will open the spreadsheet file directly, as a project.

I'm getting this error with the deep_ssm use case (automated test) ``` 2024-03-29T00:18:36.3395229Z 8: File "/__w/ShapeWorks/ShapeWorks/Examples/Python/RunUseCase.py", line 97, in 2024-03-29T00:18:36.3396061Z 8: module.Run_Pipeline(args) 2024-03-29T00:18:36.3397041Z 8: File "/__w/ShapeWorks/ShapeWorks/Examples/Python/deep_ssm.py", line 257, in Run_Pipeline...

@acreegan , I've fixed those errors, but the new pca embedder test fails on Mac and Windows. I assume due to a precision/rounding difference. I'll take a look at it...

It is most likely coming from the ACVD remeshing library. This can often happen if there are topological problems with the mesh. You might try splitting your dataset to determine...

@nawazishkhan1-nk , do you have an update on the PR?

@nawazishkhan1-nk , any update on this?