Andrew Standley

@mbierma The example you've given uses a Field rather than a Schema which presents all kinds of issues. I'm assuming that's a small mistake and you intended for PDF to...

I haven't checked the 2.0 spec, but 3.0 specs `content` as a map so I'd say that ``` @registry.handles(rule="/foo/media", method="GET", response_body_schema={200: {'video/mp4': MP4(), 'video/ogg': OGG(), 'video/quicktime': Quicktime()}}) ``` seems like...

We could write our own Metaclass for RequestSchema to bind a 'name' field at class creation time (runtime) to replicate what Marshmallow 3 is doing to support this, but updating...

Note: Let's test this once we are on Marshmallow 3 (#37) and close this out. Also may relate to #131

So looking over [PEP-561 ](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0561/) and [mypy's documentation ](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installed_packages.html), it appears that in order for flask-rebar to be PEP-561 compliant and still support Python 2.7, we would have to add...

Update: We've starting using something similar to this internally, see the link for the v3 example. I'm not opposed to adding it as a util, but I like @RookieRick suggestion...

I do like that having two classes makes the intention of derived classes clear. I hardly think that outweighs the negatives you've laid out though.

Reading over the comments on #152, I'd like to propose that we name this unified single Schema something like `StrictSchema`. I think that might make it a bit clearer when...

No parameter. Either the rebar object or the registry object would hold the hook function list reference and expose the method to register(add) another function to be run after authentication...

@RookieRick I think there may be two separate discussions. 1) Should endpoints registered with rebar be allowed to return anything other than a json encoded body in the response? 2)...