Andrew Hopp
Andrew Hopp
> need to list all plugin requirements for visualization & overlays Do you mean we have to gather requirements from the plugins before making a proposal on any future abstraction...
> There will always be a need for a multiple charting library, but for base charting types we need to ensure we have standard features supported. This is today supported...
Looks like I'm very late on this, but I think its important to provide justification on why this feature is being developed/have been developed in PPL but not in parity...
@dagneyb Do we have this prioritized yet? Or if not, I might advocate for high prioritization given the feedback above.
Seems like this is still a request feature - @kgcreative do you think we have enough requests for some design support?
@bharath-techie I assume (based on https://github.com/opensearch-project/OpenSearch-Dashboards/issues/2909) we bumped this to a later release? Are we now targeting 2.8 at this time?
@anirudha @kgcreative @dagneyb @ashwin-pc Would love to get your thoughts on the above proposal.
> creating in-product documentation This would be a great improvement. More direct integration with documentation would be ideal in general, but internal to OpenSearch Dashboards would be the best UX...
> our researcher to see how we can best share out some of the studies we've conducted that informed the concepts presented above. To add, we have some of this...
I wanted to follow-up on this and highlight some other inputs on why we might want to strive for a more unified view of the Dashboards experience. First, we should...