Adam Grare

@SanthoshRam-03 is the issue that you're having that "Cloud Tenant" dropdown shows selections that you don't think users should see?

Hey @willryals-typefi ! That PR is still open as there are a few other places which depend on eth0 that I'm working on refactoring. It isn't in any built images...

@willryals-typefi all related PRs have been merged and should land in the next release. If you want to test the fix out you can try with an azure devel image...

It seems the image storage directory has to be owned by manageiq if we are going to run the containers as that user. I tried to have e.g. /var/lib/manageiq/containers/storage owned...

For building the RPM I tried using `podman load` in `manageiq.spec.in` but that fails due to UID/GID errors ``` + podman load --root=/root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/manageiq-19.0.0-20240405144727.el9.x86_64/var/lib/manageiq/data/containers/storage --input manageiq-gemset-19.0.0/bundler/gems/manageiq-providers-embedded_terraform-a6319eeb8602/content/containers/opentofu-runner_latest time="2024-04-05T14:59:24Z" level=warning msg="Using rootless single...

@kbrock we do this double-prompt for a new password and check that the password isn't empty in the internal_database_configuration class so I moved that into a common place, would love...

Without free space on the volume group we couldn't carve out another logical volume and shrinking lvs isn't practical ... I agree that would be ideal though. We could add...

Add the options to the podman runner to change the root image directory from `$HOME/.local/share/containers/storage` to `/var/www/miq/vmdb/data/containers/storage` - [x] https://github.com/ManageIQ/floe/pull/90 - [x] https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-workflows/pull/46

ping @Fryguy

@Fryguy how about we rename this `payload_invalid` so that the "unset" case isn't that the content is bad.