Andrew Gracey

@natalieparellano There is a team at IBM that helps OSS projects build for s390x. I'm not associated with IBM but have talked with them about similar before. If you want,...

What's the status of this? I see a lot of arm related build steps and artifacts in the makefile. If I build a builder with the arm binaries and ran...

From our conversation this morning. It might be more interesting to allow buildpack authors to specify artifacts to package and publish in a more general way. For example, this could...

Changed name to be a broader feature request

I'd argue that the k8s defaults are good enough. I think reading from the pod status is fine.

Since it's up to the app developers to implement the endpoints, I think an **optional** field in the manifest specifying the liveliness and readiness check path/port would be pretty useful.

More generally, I'd eventually like to be able to have Epinio take advantage of `/healthz`, `/metrics`, the open tracing collector, etc... while degrading gracefully if the developer didn't implement the...

Let's keep this simple and allow for either a configurable paths for readiness probes or default to pid 1 detection. I don't think we need to allow http and port...

What we have is fine for beta 2. Let's get on a call late next week to look at what's possible later on.

Could this be done in an external component since most everything is done via k8s objects anyways? I think we would just need the user that affected a change to...