Aurora Gaffney
Aurora Gaffney
Since it doesn't seem like this change is wanted and there are now conflicts, I'm just going to close this PR. I implemented a wrapper object that can use the...
@fxamacker Is there still a chance of getting something like this merged? It would be a lot more convenient if I didn't have to use a wrapper object, since it...
Take care of your personal stuff and don't feel compelled to look at this. I'm not blocked on this, but I'll gladly remove my workaround in favor of this (or...
Yes, that's fine with me.
A reasonable way to approach this might be a flag in `TagOptions` that will pass the entire tag CBOR to the custom type's Unmarshal function rather than just the tag...
@fxamacker I'm decoding into `interface{}` and my custom type implements `Unmarshaler`. You say that both the CBOR tag number and its content are passed to the custom type's `UnmarshalCBOR()` function,...
@fxamacker it seems there may be more magic than I had thought. In your example, I can take `data` in `enum.UnmarshalCBOR()` and unmarshal it into both `cbor.Tag` and `[]byte` without...
I can now confirm that I can capture that tag number, but what I can't do is register multiple tag numbers with the same object.
Has there been any progress on this?
I do not have a suggested course of action here. This is just something I ran into while testing moving a Rails app from PostgreSQL to CockroachDB. I was able...