Adrian Chiris

>Concentrate used in the PR may not be a good name for the allocating policy (use one PF resource until exhausted), feel free to propose other names, I will update...

I wonder if we can get away with no user-facing API changes for `resourceList` (for now) as we support only one policy. and just have a cli flag that turns...

@zshi-redhat could you rebase this ? I assume this PR is still desired

@rozeps can you explain the problem you are trying to solve with this PR ?

> I am tring to come up with configuration that would match any PF from vendor/device XYZ, take only VFs 3-7. So if you would have a "`VFIndex`" selector it...

@rozeps this PR was discussed in today's technical meeting see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bEyEh_K9lGwQWHgUHUH-vqodYd1W-LCWRGlW0-ZVR5A/edit# We would like to understand more about your use-case and whether or not it is possible to get persistent...

>The VFIndex I think would have been a good idea if initially tought (in addition to the PFName) but right now that could conflict right one may have non-overlapping pfname...

trivy is also an option : https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy

@zshi-redhat im hoping you can help with some info

I [requested ]( https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/sriov-network-device-plugin/pull/272#discussion_r520401205)to add the preface of virtual deployments in PR#272. to me it seems (documentation wise) we jumped straight to no-iommu support, i think we are missing the...