Adlai

The precise form of the negotiation is irrelevant from the blockchain's perspective, as long as everybody signs in the end. I _strongly_ believe that we have a lot to gain...

Far from it. The current system lets makers set a floor for the miner fee, but they have to demand a `cjfee` at least that large (before they even start...

This should be merged, as it addresses #27 which is required by #171

Inputs 2 and 3 are identical. This situation is rare, but could happen if two (or more!) participants in the transaction are using the same wallet.

@mecampbellsoup One way to reduce the chance of this happening when creating "self joins" is to mess with the `merge_algorithm` parameter so that your maker and taker are picking from...

Leave one as default, and make the other greediest. It doesn't quite matter which (taker or maker) uses which (algorithm), although since the taker needs more inputs (to cover fees),...

utACK This does make scripts slightly more vulnerable to grinding induced by other computers, but I think that people running JM with ports forwarded should know what they're doing. Also,...

I'm amending my position to **NACK**, because this does open up more avenues for grinding or even worse vulnerabilities. Off the top of my head I can't think of how...

random idea from IRC: once we have the ability for participants to specify multiple outputs, the tumbler can create multiple joins at later levels to better induce forensic teeth-gnashing.

untaint.py