adiGuba
adiGuba
Hi, Nice feature to have, but but I think the `$` syntax is confusing with stores, and could cause problems for code analysis on IDEs. I think it would be...
Just some remarks/idea about the proposed syntax. 1. I dislike the fact that the default value is the first block of the switch. I don't find it very elegant, and...
Hello, Just my two-cents. IMHO the rune is more logical (and more concise) when accessing a state/prop. `$state`, `$derived` and `$props` runes allow us to declare reactive states/props. It's seem...
Also, not sure if I should post here or create another issue, but I think that untrack should handle proxified object/array. If the return value is a proxified object/array, it...
With automatic dependencies, I don't see any interest of explicit dependencies. It's a regression. I don't want explicit dependencies, just a simplier way to untrack some states/props...
Hello. This is already possible in svelte 4 ! And in svelte 5 you can also omit the ` || []` : [REPL](https://svelte-5-preview.vercel.app/#H4sIAAAAAAAAA5WQwWrDMAyGX0V4PbQQFrbdssSjsLdoevBshZi6tonlwDB-99ntCD1uGMT_S3ySpcQmbTCw7pSYFVdkHTt6zxpG376asKIhLD64uMia6YNctCc-WgCDBFo6-ylIwAC7QIJwf3gfbXlUq6swEUOppZoZyQuaQwcneGngtYE3ONd8Hm3fbn2L-YpEzoKz0mh5GdL-AAN_HBWtwklbVJlvsm_vGP9LAxuNybzGf2H3fTL__f4jOy8lpicUct6Ij-fbwiACVJHr0aBXeuXp5vu26oK1Fcvlzlen9KRRsY6WiPmcfwD8gNkdogEAAA==)
Oh sorry I don't understand your request...
`display: none` is the simplest solution as long as you don't need animation, and I don't see any performance issue with it : ```svelte Lorem ipsum ``` But this do...
I tried to implement a solution to use transitions without creating/destroying elements (so without `{#if}` or `{#each}`), and I make a small functional PoC using `transition:this`. I choose `transition:this` because...
> Like I said it simply achievable using CSS transition And Svelte's transition are achievable using CSS animation, but they allow use to correctly handle all the process (like destroying...