Andy (Steve) De George

After looking at this, I think adding full code-first examples is out of scope for the .NET Framework articles. Closing the issue, sorry!

@gewarren This one has conflicts

@tdykstra We don't really have a workflow yet for fully removed work items, so you'll need to go close the quest work item manually. When you're ready to schedule it...

Thanks, I'll mention that.

I think the discussion on this fizzled out. I'll reopen if I get back to the point of annoyance with the rule I was at, at the time. 😁

- Converted the issue metadata to the new style - Put this up in the next sprint

@rbhanda @ashnaga When will this land for .NET 8? Is it only after 2025 is out of preview?

@Rick-Anderson So are you thinking something like > Publishing your app as framework-dependent produces an application that includes only your application itself and its dependencies. Users of the application have...

@Rick-Anderson I don't agree with that direction (but I'll welcome feedback from the product group). We have tons of customers doing desktop and console apps. This documentation is speaking to...

I think that users would be better served with technology-specific publishing articles. This would help SEO much more than putting blurbs in the content that doesn't get picked up. For...