Alice de Bardonnèche

Results 51 comments of Alice de Bardonnèche

We can propose something with the CNES organization :)

@duboise-cnes thanks, i think we could talk about the coregistration architecture in a meeting @adehecq Thanks for the tip. For the fit method, I would prefer to discuss the type...

> > I plan to revisit this matter after the 21/08/2024 meeting. > > Is there anything new to discuss here? I already changed the ticket regarding the meeting yes,...

Based on my limited experience with xdem, I believe it's possible. I will create an issue for the metrics in the CLI before developing this one, just to be sure.

From @adehecq : "In fact, the other functions are not specifically implemented because they are available with NumPy (e.g., min, max, std, var, etc.). The interface with NumPy (https://geoutils.readthedocs.io/en/stable/core_array_funcs.html) makes...

An another approach has been discuss, i close for #567

@adehecq , @duboise-cnes tell me if you agreed

Hello, I am glad you suggested using ruff. I will revise the ticket with this solution. And an think about a refactoring for smaller files

Ruff seems bad as it job : **with ruff :** ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/efc7b613-8c3a-44e8-bb8a-307e81f01632) **with pylint:** ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b20394df-9aab-43fc-a5a6-3a5cc87282a1)

I finally found a great config file for Ruff, and it seems suitable for our project. I didn’t ignore any rules, so we can discuss them during development if needed....