Adam Růžička

Ideally, yes

Thank you @MariaAga !

FTR there was a single test failure when running only with the dynflow changes https://ci.theforeman.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/katello-pr-test/detail/katello-pr-test/13907/pipeline/ , let's see what happens if we pull tasks changes into the mix as well

Apparently it passed with the tasks changes, good to know.

Took the liberty of merging this myself since it was approved some time ago. Thank you

You should be able to use `?` placeholders and `sanitize_sql_for_conditions` to prevent sql injection. See [here](https://github.com/wvanbergen/scoped_search/wiki/Search-definition#external-search-methods) Something along the lines of this *could* work ```ruby class Snippet < ApplicationRecord has_rich_text...

This should most likely be fixed by https://github.com/wvanbergen/scoped_search/pull/204 , could you check with latest master?

I'm not sure I follow. The tags are in the repo and corresponding releases are out on rubygems. Or are you talking about some other release?

Hi, thank you for you contribution. I briefly glanced over the code and it looks good to me, hopefully I'll have time to properly test it tomorrow. In the meantime,...

Could you post an example of how you're trying to use it? It seems to work fine on my machine