Mike Adams

I won't be heartbroken if we don't merge this - there is one remaining vulnerability that can't be resolved as long as we support python 3.6 and 1.0 resolves all...

@colin-pm @briantist most, if not all, of these failures are caused by breaking changes these features. Do we want version specific implementations of these features? Do we want to only...

> perhaps having an issue opened for each one would be best. My thought was this issue would become a project, and one or more of the failing tests would...

> The other idea I thought of is to create a hvac.response object that we could return that's similar to a requests.response or a dict. It would just have the...

> > I was thinking this also, but I was concerned it would be a _major_ breaking change. Every app that uses this library would need to adapt to the...

Is this still an issue?

What is the vault API behavior around this parameter? I notice you don't do any handling of existing metadata, no attempt at merging the updated dictionary, etc. Does vault handle...

I tried this path prefix and I get a 404.