Michael Ackley
Michael Ackley
This is definitely something we could do, I guess the 2 hang ups I have are - Does this split cause an unintuitive deviation from the official Quickfix implementations in...
Sure, I think the decisions in those repos do have some bearing on what we could or should do in this one, regardless of some flexibility we are afforded in...
@Neal resolved in https://github.com/quickfixgo/quickfix/releases/tag/v0.9.0
@sylr If you added a test or two here to ensure accessing these fields in the header doesn't cause any issues here if they don't exist, I will merge it...
> Git history suggests there used to be Can you point me to the relevant history? I can't seem to find it
Please submit a PR with this feature if you end up implementing it, I would like it
I think I understand the problem, and I think the only repo that might have a solution for us to follow here would be quickfix-j. I think changing the datatype...
@haoyang1994 I think our test coverage for dynamic sessions is spotty/nonexistent, so I am hesitant to remove all the dynamic sessions handling logic without at least some new tests for...
This has backwards compatibility, correct? Quite a lot of changes in here, but it certainly has a lot of benefits