Alex Potsides

@nabijaczleweli thanks for your feedback and the additional use cases. > If this only governs the serialised form: > If this governs both the serialised form and opines on ORM/binary...

My preference would be for option 2 since relative paths in multiaddrs seem to be too fragile to be useful. What do you think @MarcoPolo?

> "This is different if you resolve it in a different context" is true of all paths/addresses It's not really. Something like `/ip4/123.123.123.123/tcp/1234` is unambiguous (assuming you can route to...

@dependabot recreate

This still appears to be broken in Firefox 139.

Great, please submit a PR!

@Rushhaabhhh this thread is for a specific piece of work, please do not hijack it. If you wish to discuss a potential third way, please open a new issue or...

I haven't got to the point of testing NAT traversal yet, still a lot of PRs to land in the deps. I was wondering if each `RTCPeerConnection` could negotiate it's...

I have forked `node-datachannel` as `@ipshipyard/node-datachannel` with all of the above patches applied. Now CI is passing I'm going to merge this to allow further experimentation.

``` 2025-04-14T16:19:06.934377Z INFO libp2p_swarm: local_peer_id=12D3KooWAv7grb9Z2y3Yahs2M2ojDvhF17ncuhq2e3V4nStm7voy 2025-04-14T16:19:06.934443Z INFO interop_tests: Running ping test local_peer=12D3KooWAv7grb9Z2y3Yahs2M2ojDvhF17ncuhq2e3V4nStm7voy 2025-04-14T16:19:06.934514Z DEBUG libp2p_core::transport::choice: Failed to listen on address using libp2p_core::transport::dummy::DummyTransport address=/ip4/0.0.0.0/udp/0/webrtc-direct 2025-04-14T16:19:06.934703Z DEBUG netlink_proto::handle: handle: forwarding new request...