Bruno Oliveira da Silva
Bruno Oliveira da Silva
@jonkoops @mposolda should we remove the label help-wanted? Considering that this is an important issue?
@douglaspalmer why the status is in "Ready for review" if the PR was closed?
Hi @coeing, @jonkoops has started his research about it and has more details. But it seems that right now the best alternative is https://github.com/panva/node-openid-client.
@marcoBros only to bring some clarity here, there's no "new node Keycloak implementation". The Keycloak Node.js adapter will be deprecated, and it is recommended to users to transition to another...
## Fix for reading Branch protection For repositories with classic branch protection rules, we need to create a PAT a described here (https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md) and use as a secret in the...
@harshitasao the most concerning aspect of merging those changes for me is the high number of false positives. From what I looked briefly at the documentation, it should be possible...
> Yes but the risks should the PAT ever leak are greater than the benefit we’d get from having the Action run the check, so Scorecard itself recommends against giving...
@keycloak/maintainers I believe this is a great addition to our project, and I'd be more than happy to collaborate with @harshitasao on it. Do you see any blockers?
@harshitasao whenever you have the time, please check the comments on your PR.