Austin Bonander

@jgrund keep the previous type please, that's what it's there for. If you put `application/x-rpm` first it'll be what's automatically inferred but the existing type can continue to work for...

It didn't come up when I searched, but I guess I forgot to check closed issues on this repository specifically. Regardless, I would propose _not_ to short-circuit since I mostly...

Besides, I think if I _wanted_ a short-circuiting implementation here, I would implement it over _checked_ arithmetic and use `.unwrap_or(T::MAX)` at the end. That would be significantly clearer in intent.

Ideally I could just do `.sum::()`. Moreover, the fact this works (using `.sum()` in general) for `Wrapping` but _not_ `Saturating` is a weird asymmetry.