Abel Braaksma

@kekyo, it doesn't solve what I mentioned before. The problem is that it still doesn't cover overloads. How can the compiler infer the correct types here? ```c# public sealed class...

@auduchinok, yes, that could work. But indeed, it isn't too pretty. While syntactically that covers it, I'm not convinced of using `:?`, which currently means 'runtime type check'. In the...

@TheJayMann, I think that's a bug, certainly considering that the documentation states otherwise. That doesn't remove for us the requirement to be able to deal with overloads, esp assuming c#...

> If you know the type ahead of time, you can already call a concrete method to extract what you want. @yatli That's an interesting consideration. So far I saw...

> in C# one would write: I wonder if in C# it works with a one-tuple. If it doesn't, we could make this feature closer to existing F# language by...