Abel Braaksma
Abel Braaksma
Just happened upon my own bug report again, lol. Apparently I try to use this more often than I care to admit. Hmm, time for an RFC, I guess. Anyway,...
Great that you're looking into this, I'd really love this feature! But keep in mind that these proposals do not yet have an RFC (at least not one that I...
If you are going to fix this, make it an optional change. I, and possibly others, have used this "bug" as a feature to make it easier to generate assembly...
That works for me and sounds excellent :)
I think this is very reasonable. However, implementation may be a tad trickier than it seems at first, as empty curlies are sometimes valid, for instance: ```f# type C =...
Yes, any `approved-in-principle` language suggestion needs an RFC, and an RFC discussion thread.
Related to (but not the same) #3486 and #3487. I think that indentation is ignored because `#` lines are typically a type of compiler directive and as such not part...
@auduchinok, my apologies, I misunderstood, as I focused on the text and title and missed the comments in the code. Could you perhaps update the original text with a complete...
But that would suggest that implementing an interface with `inref` is not possible. Maybe that's by design, but if so, it would be nice to have the error at an...
Why not just write: ```f# task { let! one = getData1() let! two = getData2() ... } ``` There's no need to first assign a task to a variable and...