Abdelrahman

> As an alternative to providing an initial value, you can provide a function, making it easy to keep a spring in sync with some other value: Correct me if...

Yeah fair. I just worry this might cause weird bugs because you expect the values to always be in sync.

> My biggest concern with this proposal atm is that we'd be _intentionally_ removing the distinction between the reactive bits and the non-reactive bits. Options will have a `Readable` type...

> > I want to stick as closely to melt-ui types as possible, that's why I used `CreateSelectProps['multiple']` to not diverge when there are e.g. breaking changes. > > Why...

Does this mean every builder has a separate version? Is pinning down all packages to the same version a good idea?

Interesting. That sounds like dependency versioning hell with builders that depend on other builders.