Aaron Ang

I found the following. I think the code is compiled correctly in: * `babel-preset-es2016`, [try in REPL](https://babeljs.io/repl/#?babili=false&evaluate=false&lineWrap=false&presets=es2016&targets=&browsers=&builtIns=false&code=let%20v%20%3D%200%3B%0A%0Aswitch%20(v)%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20case%200%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20let%20v%20%3D%201%3B%0A%7D). * `babel-preset-es2017`, [try in REPL](https://babeljs.io/repl/#?babili=false&evaluate=false&lineWrap=false&presets=es2017&targets=&browsers=&builtIns=false&code=let%20v%20%3D%200%3B%0A%0Aswitch%20(v)%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20case%200%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20let%20v%20%3D%201%3B%0A%7D). But not in `babel-preset-es2015`, [try in REPL](https://babeljs.io/repl/#?babili=false&evaluate=false&lineWrap=false&presets=es2015&targets=&browsers=&builtIns=false&code=let%20v%20%3D%200%3B%0A%0Aswitch%20(v)%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20case%200%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20let%20v%20%3D%201%3B%0A%7D).

@xtuc But if you look at the [REPL](https://babeljs.io/repl/#?babili=false&evaluate=false&lineWrap=false&presets=es2015&targets=&browsers=&builtIns=false&code=let%20v%20%3D%200%3B%0A%0Aswitch%20(v)%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20case%200%3A%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20let%20v%20%3D%201%3B%0A%7D) of `babel-preset-es2015`. The compiled code is invalid too.

@existentialism Please check: - babel/babel#5431 - babel/babili#462 - babel/babel-preset-env#194 These patches should make the build pass.

@existentialism Once babel/babel#5612 and babel/babili#496 are merged, this pull request should pass LinkCheck.

I have played around with this branch and here I will summarize my observations. 1. It would be nicer if the issue titles wouldn't continue on the next line right...

Here you go. 

Just asking for some clarification here. Would the ask be to allow editors to select text in a cell and have a similar pop-up show up for regular text outside...

I would love to work on this but currently, I have to focus on graduating first 😞 I will check in again once I am done with my master's thesis.

I see, after a page refresh it is correct :smile:

I guess I will leave this issue open?