Andres Almiray

Is the `ValueObject` the right place to do this kind of check?

Great news! Very much looking forward to testing the new codebase 😄

Additional settings in `pom.xml` would be needed to handle the extra artifact with JReleaser. This should be done with a profile to override the "default" behavior.

Just ran a quick check with `v1.0.0-M1` and `v1.0.0-M2` and it appears the `fullChangelog` setting is not being honored at the moment, confirming the observations by @AlmasB

@HiouaniHalim I'll advise you to ask @abhinayagarwal or @AlmasB as they take care of this project, not me.

Benjamin: the comboBox is visible. Invoking "clickOn('item')" would work as long as there is no other clickable node that has the same text, iow, addign a button with text "item...

True, but wouldn't using the `java.logging` module be enough? Most 3rd part logging frameworks can route j.u.l calls to their logging pipeline anyway.

How is that API supposed to work? So far I've found examples that claim you must implement your own `System.LoggerFinder` and `Logger`.

What I can understand looking at https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/pull/232/commits/412867078d5af98899a8250d4c6f32eff5129e66, a `System.Logger` implementation delegates to "something" that performs thee actual logging. In the case of the previous link it's an SLF4J logger. In...

Perhaps if the main launcher implemented a given interface that allows passing a read-only view of the `Layers` instance? I wonder what sort of classloading issues this would cause as...