aJamDonut

> Not sure if this is the most elegant approach, but is my attempt at 'Moving within range of target' > > #75 you legend, i was literally just about...

Sadly I find several performance issues with the solution, due to the fact it essentially loops over the entire node list multiple times during its calculation. It would be better...

? it always gives shortest path unless weights are used

fyi. demo links to lingerie website with adult toys on it sometimes.

sorry for the old response, i wrote it later down the line and forgot about this. commit here, if anyone wants it i might make a pr https://github.com/aJamDonut/CustomStar/commit/ae4e8fdb7e23bd39049a06df1092da55ee4ce3ad

it's been in use for a while now no issues

@dragonwhites I've also just started to get this issue while refactoring some code. I do think it's my code, but all the bodies do seem correct. But did you find...

> > @dragonwhites I've also just started to get this issue while refactoring some code. I do think it's my code, but all the bodies do seem correct. But did...

On another note it appears setAngle (and so I assume others) has no checks for any of the values passed and so no type safety there, in my case I...

WARNING: 0:11: '=' : global variable initializers should be constant expressions (uniforms and globals are allowed in global initializers for legacy compatibility) ERROR: 0:18: '/' : wrong operand types no...