Andreas Sturmlechner
Andreas Sturmlechner
Why not keep 2.1.4 and stabilise it?
It is the maintainer's decision. How many bugs do you think currently stable 2.0.2 has that are fixed in 2.1.4? Do the known bugs fixed by 2.1.5 or 2.1.6 outweigh...
Looks like this project is on track to move to kde.org. So I might as well take care of this PR. https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/2022-September/001351.html
> removing app-backup/rear will collide with PR #26828 (opened 6 days ago) It would autoresolve on rebase, right?
> @a17r you did not have to drop dev-db/ocp-0.2-r1 Dropping EAPI-6 is what this PR is about, would there still be any reason for anyone to mask 0.3 in order...
> > > removing app-backup/rear will collide with PR #26828 (opened 6 days ago) > > > > > > It would autoresolve on rebase, right? > > Hmm.. can...
It is as if Qt5 is built without dbus support. Revdeps fail too. Something is changed in the build system, no idea what.
a lot of debugging has already happened by @Arfrever maybe they can chime in let's try to get you on the same page via irc backlog (some progress was made...