Mauryan Kansara
Mauryan Kansara
> In your example you have 3 groups that overlap with each other. That should make some violations. can you also reply to my other points mentioned in the https://github.com/checkstyle/checkstyle/issues/3770#issuecomment-1975256555...
The issue #14273 will be continuation of this issue, updating the google_checks.xml based on the new functionality. > If we want to add new functionality to OverloadMethodsDeclarationOrder check, this needs...
> > OverloadedConstructorOrder > > I am fine with this, but... > > > a few nuances with constructors such as compact constructors in records > > Can we explain...
> > @nrmancuso thanks for the detailed explanation, you have strong points... @rnveach can you pls confirm on how we should approach this issue? then I will start working on...
> @Zopsss we need to extend issue description to show good and bad code, with classes and records to show users clearly what the behavior should be and make sure...
@romani can you approve this issue?
@romani
> @Zopsss No one likes the constant pinging and I would consider it rude. Not all of us live in GH to respond to every message every day. This is...
hey @romani can you review this issue pls?
> What order of ctor we expect? From less parameters to more parameters? I do not think we do this for methods. > > Did you mean we are going...