Peter Hill
Peter Hill
Good idea! Do you know if the more recent versions are backwards compatible? Some people might have custom site CSS, and I would be a little wary of breaking that...
You mean in docstrings, like `[[filename.f90:84]]`?
Understood! That should absolutely be do-able.
There's an argument that internal procedures are an implementation detail and so perhaps shouldn't be included in the documentation. So this is somewhere between a bug and a feature request....
Ok, that is definitely convincing! Breaking the call graph (in the mathematical sense, rather than the image sense) isn't good.
I think this is already solved by setting `proc_internals: true`?
It took me some time to reproduce this, but it turns out to be the fault of the preprocessor. `ford` runs `cpp -traditional-cpp -E -D__GFORTRAN__` over `.F90` files by default,...
Good point, then it might not even need the doc-comments, except if you want a docstring on the namelist itself: ```Fortran integer :: foo !< docstring real :: bar !<...
Please could you post an example image of what you mean? Maybe what it currently looks like, and a mockup of what you'd want it to look like (even just...
Lovely, thanks! I think the first issue should be easy enough to fix. I'm not sure about the second one though. Would you be able to cut your code down...