Yuriy Velichko

I converted the proposed steps into objectives for the ticket. It is still in the discussion mode. Feel free to share your thoughts.

> I would recommend not separating adapters by branch. I could get into several reasons, but the biggest is that it would prevent clients from using multiple adapters in the...

Hi @elq81hc ! I'm afraid the way you are using the imp pixel isn't correct. The SDK renders the content of the creative in the internal WebView and tracks this...

Thanks for the additional info. However, there is still no mechanism in the creative you shared. It's a regular HTML markup with a static pixel that will be rendered on...

It makes sense, since most probably, the impression trackers are registered inside the VAST tag. The SDK parses the VAST tag and fires them due to changes in viewability. Could...

Thanks for the very informative doc. I need some time to study it in detail and define what is missing in the Prebid SDK to support it in full mode....

Hi @elq81hc ! I studied the docs one more time, and it looks like the TTD doesn't proclaim that the `adm` based impression tracker is fired when the ad is...

> Its possible to use codable, but in my experience Codable tends to be too strict for most uses. In our case I think we want to prioritize successful parsing...

> @YuriyVelichkoPI Can we hold up on this PR and prioritize merging in the SPM migration PRs? Those PRs include the swift migration part of this PR, and I'd like...

Hi @jclou @mdanylov-sigma ! What are the plans for this PR? I noticed that many classes were rewritten in Swift as part of the migration to SPM, but I didn't...