Juri Solodenko

It's a follow-up problem of a known bug which will be fixed in V12 (https://github.com/Open-Systems-Pharmacology/PK-Sim/issues/2592) For now: look in your parameter identification configuration for the duplicated pairs of {Outputs; Observed...

>Anything to change here? From my point of view: not. @sfrechen please comment

As far as I understood @sfrechen : [his suggestion](https://github.com/Open-Systems-Pharmacology/PK-Sim/issues/1324#issuecomment-462767363) was to remove `*f_cell` in the calculation `CLSpec=f(CL_pls,...)`. Thus, same CLSpec in plasma and in a enzymatic process would still lead...

@ju-rgen Window height should be increased in this case - protein name will be shown above the expression diagram. 

@PavelBal s. also discussions in #966 and #946

>Pseudo-random number generator ;) And I thought it would be [this](https://www.acronymfinder.com/Penicillin-Resistant-Neisseria-Gonorrhea-(PRNG).html) :rofl:

I think if we enable saving/loading of Building Blocks to/from snapshot (#1312) - it would be enough? @PavelBal (which can be done already now in dev mode)

Still, I would not provide the seed as an **input** parameter in PK-Sim. I would at most show the used seed value after the population was created. Then you could...

Because advanced parameters are created separately from the "main" population creation. Of course you could use the population seed for each advanced parameter. But then if you e.g. have 2...

>Why not re-use the same RNG instance also for advanced parameters? Theoretically possible. But then you also need to keep track **in which order advanced parameters were added**