Yuki2718
Yuki2718
@THEtomaso Just a personal opinion about the matter you noted in the previous thread. Using social filter does not necessarily mean you wanna block anything social. I don't use Facebook...
> > > I maintain my own private filters which currently include about 2,000 rules each > > Getting close to 19.000 rules in my own filter, and particularly the...
> > > PSA (although not a critical one): If you ever see any filterlists use `$reload`, it's probably a pretty fraudulent list, especially considering it's only believed to be...
> > > Seems like it. > > Apparently it was an extension by the name of `广告净化器` (Its official English name, if any, is hard to figure out) that...
Sorry for a silly question, but this explanation of the new remove() syntax, "it must only be used as a trailing operator", is beyond my English skills (I looked up...
> > > Given the context of https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Procedural-cosmetic-filters#subjectremove, my understanding is that it must be the last `:` value to be used in an entry. So the plain meaning of...
@gwarser thx for clearing things up, I somehow thought a completely different syntax may be applied to remove() as it's called operator, but your example of :hide() cleared my confusion....
I've noticed substantially more errors by AdGuard Base List than usual:  It seems its all related to style syntax, but I can't tell what's wrong - tho at first...
All right, then they should have increased the use of such rules recently. Thx for explanation : )
Quite a shock...