Xuanwo
I have a new idea for naming: How about using `Tabular`? So we will have: - `load_tabular()` / `load_table()` / `load_view()` - `Tabular::Table(table)` / `Tabular::View(view)` What do you think?
> I would avoid the confusion with the vendor. Oh, I didn't take the vendor into consideration. I think tabular is a good alternative to table like and widely used...
> In general I prefer smaller files, but I agree with @marvinlanhenke that for we can wait for more features to land before conducting further restructure. I feel the same...
Basic integration has been added in https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/324. We can create a new tracking issues for missing pieces.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. This feature is indeed included in our process of writing data into Iceberg. We simply need to make the API accessible.
Let me handle this.
Been added in https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/pull/520
The SQL catalog work has been started. Let's create a new tracking issue instead.
What do you think? cc @Fokko @liurenjie1024 @JanKaul
> Did I understand correctly that the `location` field in the `TableCreation` struct relates to the `location` field in the [table-metadata](https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/#table-metadata)? Do I understand correctly that @zeodtr's idea is to...