Cees-Jan Kiewiet

Interesting, and I assume this only happens because you don't group by labels 🤔 . Let me see, this should be fairly easy to fix.

Could be, but I also like the `Pull requests` as a seperator. it also turned out to be a bit trickier to do then I thought. But will continue tonight

@glensc How would #71 work for you? You'd had to set an extra flag, but that will group everything not matched by (other) labels under the one you specify by...

@glensc The only issue with enabling it by default is that would be a backward compatibility break, and that I don't have a good default word.

@glensc Jumped into that issue, let's see :)

It is treated like any other label.

Seems to be introduced in #29 to resolve #27

@boesing That should do the trick, and probably also use a dataprovider for that changed tests and toss several scenarios at it.

@prisis would you have time to rebase and update this PR? This is a great future to get into `v1.3`

Thank you for filing this PR, could you rebase on the latest changes in master now that #106, and do you think it is possible to test this?