Wdestroier

In the Overview of a proposal for structs document summary it says: > The desire for a zero cost wrapper type (motivated largely by interop concerns) I think structs shouldn't...

@mraleph Thanks 😊, just to be clear I'm fine with any decision about this...

Hi, @parlough. This server is great indeed. I'm not much of a marketeer myself, but to increase engagement I believe that they need to make it official... like the Flutter...

Maybe add a `name` property to `FileSystemEntity` and change the `firstWhere()` method from `Iterable` to return a nullable value...

I'd prefer if everything was publicly accessible and functions/methods/properties could be reassigned. ```dart Never exit(int code) { ... }; ``` could be interpreted as ```dart Never Function(int) exit = (code)...

The `new` keyword is convenient to people coming from other languages like Java, C# and TypeScript. The removal of it may not be much beneficial to the language.

@Andrflor you could write `bind(Rx | Obs obs) => bindStream(obs.stream);` with union types.

Maybe allow ranges in cases for integer numbers ```dart case 4..5: case 4..

Should the parameter list come before the return type?

@Levi-Lesches Great, thanks!