Brian Ward

I agree we should support these! But, I also wanted to clear up a possible misconception: > However, it's not efficient to run a function over a matrix using a...

> Are there complex functions that are missing from the Math library Generally yes, though sometimes all that's needed is loosening an existing template bound

> Sorry for a broken PR, I believed the tests pass, but apparently I made some mistake when running the tests locally. No worries! It's often quite a miracle when...

I'm still not sure we need something like `chains.hpp` at all. If we had analysis functions that took as an argument `std::vector chains`, I suspect that is all we really...

#3313

20240715 was added in #344 which I believe makes this obsolete. If you specifically need this version, let us know

I will do a patch release tomorrow

> this boilerplate needs to be updated regularly---it's really 2.35 Slightly off topic, but I would be in favor of removing this entirely from the docs repo. I think it’s...

Correct, the only sizes we currently check are on output parameters, not inputs. The checks are easy to add, but do lead to a performance cost that all users would...

If you're the kind of user who cares about disabling the input check, the cost of simply branching to decide whether or not that check gets run probably bugs you....