KingWampy

> > Currently, providing source code is optional. I move that we "strongly suggest" each contribution to provide source code. Source code is extremely important since manim is both the...

> Add a field for which verison of Manim the source code/video is written for Good point! We can include a little info hover that tells them to run the...

@leotrs We can just put a blanket statement at the bottom of the page, and, if you guys think it is absolutely necessary (I do not), we can create a...

> Let's have a blanket statement somewhere in an about section or something like that. In other words, at the bottom of the page since it's a SPA. What's wrong...

> i propose using three «reviewed states». The lowest is «submitted», and therefore hidden from the users. One a trusted reviewer accepted the title/subject/description etc, the video will be marked...

Not that anyone should feel pressured to pay for hosting for this (as I can't), but if this was hosted on a server, we could actually make this into a...

> It would only be for fully-reviewed content (which is not hard for images/gifs). And isn't it possible with pull requests ? You don't have to automate every part. I'm...

Regarding languages, would this be a good implementation? We could add a language field to the submission form that asks what language the video is in. Default to English and...

Small update: * Meta tags have been confirmed to look good. * I have submitted a PR to RVerify to strengthen the captcha against spam attacks [here.](https://github.com/zpfz/RVerify.js/pull/3) If we end...

> It seems weird that we rely on the PR to get the date but if we can't easily determine it in an automated way that's ok. It's not too...