WWIJP comments

Results 4 comments of


                                            WWIJP

Extra sign for "potentially vulnerable" "[*] Found"

Hello, Sorry but I don’t understand what you mean. Please explain it in details. Thanks Best regards Philipp @WWIJP Use [?] sign for identification. For example: [?] Found CVE-2021-4104 (log4j...

Extra sign for "potentially vulnerable" "[*] Found"

Hello Yang Ah ok but we’ve just the “[?] Found” like: [?] Found CVE-2021-4104 (log4j 1.2) vulnerability in /path/to/log4j-1.1.3.jar, log4j N/A Without the (mitigated)part at the end. ***@***.*** Its just...

Extra sign for "potentially vulnerable" "[*] Found"

Hello That is perfect, thanks a lot! Very best regards Philipp Von: Yang, BongYeol (xeraph) ***@***.*** Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Februar 2022 16:10 An: logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner ***@***.***> Cc: Henkel, Jan-Philipp (IT/IEV) ***@***.***>;...

Extra sign for "potentially vulnerable" "[*] Found"

Hello BongYeol I’ve a question. Do you need such files: [?] Found CVE-2021-44228 (log4j 2.x) vulnerability in /tmp/hive-warehouse-connector-assembly-1.0.0.7.1.5.0-257.jar, log4j N/A To detect the log4j version? If so how is it...